Rewrite partialSumIndicators A n as the pointwise sum (function-valued sum) of the
individual indicator functions.
The σ-algebra generated by the indicator 1_s : Ω → ℝ of a set s is contained in the
σ-algebra generated by the singleton family {s}.
Independence of two sets implies independence of their real-valued indicator functions.
The indicator function 1_s of a measurable set is in L² for any probability measure.
The square of an indicator function equals the indicator function itself: (1_s)² = 1_s.
The variance of the indicator of a measurable set is bounded by its probability:
Var(1_s) = P(s)(1 - P(s)) ≤ P(s).
The expected value E[S_n] = ∑_{i < n} P(A_i) of the partial sum of indicators.
For pairwise independent events A_i, the variance of the partial sum of indicators
is bounded by its expectation: Var(S_n) ≤ E[S_n]. This follows from Var(1_{A_i}) ≤ P(A_i)
and the fact that pairwise independence makes covariances vanish.
If ∑ P(A_n) = ∞, then the expectations E[S_n] = ∑_{i<n} P(A_i) of the partial sums
tend to ∞.
The map n ↦ E[S_n] is monotone since each summand P(A_i) is nonnegative.
Successive expectations differ by at most one: E[S_{n+1}] - E[S_n] = P(A_n) ≤ 1.
The subsequence φ(k) used in the proof of the pairwise-independent strong law: it
chooses the first index n such that E[S_n] ≥ (k+1)². Because the spacing grows
quadratically, the Chebyshev tail bounds for S_{φ(k)}/E[S_{φ(k)}] are summable.
Instances For
Defining property of sllnSubseq: at index φ(k) we have E[S_{φ(k)}] ≥ (k+1)².
Every index φ(k) in the subsequence is strictly positive, because E[S_0] = 0 cannot
reach (k+1)² > 0.
The subsequence φ : ℕ → ℕ is strictly monotone.
The expectation E[S_{φ(k)}] along the subsequence is strictly positive (at least
(k+1)² > 0).
The partial-sum random variable S_n is in L².
Almost sure convergence from quantitative tail bounds: if for every m, almost surely
|f_k(ω) - a| < 1/(m+1) eventually as k → ∞, then almost surely f_k(ω) → a.
Chebyshev tail bound along the subsequence: the probability that
|S_{φ(k)}/E[S_{φ(k)}] - 1| ≥ ε is bounded by 1/(ε² (k+1)²). This is the summable estimate
used to conclude a.s. convergence along the subsequence.
Summing the Chebyshev bounds along the subsequence gives a finite total measure, since
∑ 1/(k+1)² < ∞. This is the Borel-Cantelli input for the subsequence.
Pointwise monotonicity of the partial sum process: for each ω, the map
n ↦ S_n(ω) is nondecreasing.
The partial sum S_n(ω) ≥ 0 since it is a sum of nonnegative indicators.
For a strictly monotone sequence φ : ℕ → ℕ and any n ≥ φ 0, there exists k such that
φ k ≤ n < φ (k+1). This "bracketing" is used to sandwich a general n between
two consecutive subsequence indices.
Upper bound on E[S_{φ(k)}] by (k+1)² + 1, since the previous index φ(k) - 1 fails
the threshold (k+1)² and the expectation grows by at most one per step.
The ratio E[S_{φ(k+1)}] / E[S_{φ(k)}] tends to 1 as k → ∞. This "slow growth"
property allows interpolation between the subsequence and the full sequence in the SLLN proof.
Pairwise-independent strong law for indicator sums (Lecture 9): suppose
A₁, A₂, … are pairwise independent events with ∑ P(A_n) = ∞, and write
S_n = ∑_{i=1}^n 1_{A_i}. Then the ratio S_n / E[S_n] tends almost surely to 1.