A ℤ_+-ring (general version, not requiring ι to be finite): a set ι of
distinguished basis elements with nonnegative integer structure constants N i j k
satisfying unitality and associativity, and with finite multiplicative support.
Instances For
Alias for Definition 1.42.1 of Etingof–Gelaki–Nikshych–Ostrik: a ℤ_+-ring is the
general (possibly infinite-index) version ZPlusRingGen.
Instances For
When the index set ι is finite, a general ZPlusRingGen collapses to a
ZPlusRing: the finsum associativity becomes an ordinary Finset.sum.
Instances For
A ZPlusRing over a finite index set ι can always be regarded as a ZPlusRingGen,
since finiteness automatically supplies the finite-support and finsum data.
Instances For
The squared coefficient at k: the total ∑_{i,j} N(i, j, k) of structure
constants whose product lands at k. This bounds dimensions of irreducible modules.
Instances For
The maximum of R.squaredCoeff k over all basis elements k, which bounds
the size of any irreducible ℤ_+-module over R.
Instances For
Each squared coefficient is bounded by the maximum squared coefficient over ι.
A ℤ_+-module over a ℤ_+-ring R: a finite basis set κ together with
nonnegative integer action constants act i l k, satisfying unitality from R.I₀
and a compatibility expressing associativity of the action.
- act : ι → κ → κ → ℕ
Instances For
Alias for Definition 2.8.1 of Etingof–Gelaki–Nikshych–Ostrik: a ℤ_+-module
over a ℤ_+-ring is what ZPlusModule formalizes.
Instances For
The diagonal unitality identity for a ℤ_+-module: summing the action of the
unit elements s ∈ R.I₀ on l against itself gives 1.
A nonempty proper subset S ⊆ κ is a ℤ_+-submodule of M if it is closed
under the action: M.act i l k ≠ 0 and l ∈ S implies k ∈ S.
- nonempty : S.Nonempty
Instances For
A ℤ_+-module is irreducible if it has no proper nonempty ℤ_+-submodule.
Instances For
Alias for Definition 2.8.3: irreducibility of a ℤ_+-module.
Instances For
The sum ∑_{k} act(i, l, k) of action coefficients of i ∈ ι acting on l ∈ κ.
Instances For
The total action coefficient at l ∈ κ: the sum over all i ∈ ι of actCoeffSum i l.
Instances For
Summing actCoeffSum s l over s ∈ R.I₀ gives 1, a consequence of unitality
of the ℤ_+-module action.
If l₀ ∈ κ minimizes totalActCoeff, then M.totalActCoeff l₀ is bounded by
R.maxSquaredCoeff. This is the key inequality underlying Proposition 2.8.7.
In an irreducible ℤ_+-module, for every pair l, k ∈ κ there exists some
i ∈ ι whose action takes l to a positive coefficient at k.
For an irreducible ℤ_+-module the cardinality of the basis κ is bounded
above by totalActCoeff l for every l ∈ κ.
Proposition 2.8.7 (Etingof–Gelaki–Nikshych–Ostrik): if M is an irreducible
ℤ_+-module over a ℤ_+-ring R, then |κ| ≤ R.maxSquaredCoeff.
The regular ℤ_+-module of a ℤ_+-ring R: R acting on its own basis ι
via the structure constants N.
Instances For
A morphism of ℤ_+-modules over the same ℤ_+-ring R: a nonnegative integer
matrix toMatrix : κ₁ → κ₂ → ℕ that intertwines the two actions of R.
- toMatrix : κ₁ → κ₂ → ℕ
Instances For
An isomorphism between two ℤ_+-modules: a bijection of basis sets κ₁ ≃ κ₂
that intertwines the two actions of R.
Instances For
A ℤ_+-module is indecomposable if its basis κ cannot be split into two
nonempty disjoint action-closed subsets covering κ.
Instances For
Every irreducible ℤ_+-module is indecomposable: a proper action-closed
nonempty subset would contradict irreducibility.
Exactness of a ℤ_+-module: whenever act i l k ≠ 0 there exists some j ∈ ι
with act j k l ≠ 0, i.e. the action is symmetric up to relabeling.
Instances For
Lemma 2.8.5 of Etingof–Gelaki–Nikshych–Ostrik: an indecomposable, exact
ℤ_+-module is irreducible.
A subset S ⊆ κ is action-closed under M if whenever l ∈ S and
M.act i l k ≠ 0 we have k ∈ S.
Instances For
An action-closed subset S ⊆ κ is an indecomposable piece if it cannot be
partitioned into two nonempty disjoint action-closed subsets.
Instances For
An action-closed subset S ⊆ κ is an irreducible piece if it contains no
proper nonempty action-closed subset.
Instances For
A ℤ_+-decomposition of M: a finite family of nonempty pairwise disjoint
action-closed subsets of κ whose union covers κ.
- covers (k : κ) : ∃ P ∈ parts, k ∈ P
- closed (P : Finset κ) : P ∈ parts → M.IsActionClosed P
Instances For
Auxiliary recursion lemma: every nonempty action-closed subset S ⊆ κ admits
a partition into nonempty pairwise disjoint action-closed indecomposable pieces.
Every ℤ_+-module (with nonempty basis) admits a ℤ_+-decomposition into
indecomposable pieces.
For exact ℤ_+-modules, every indecomposable piece is automatically irreducible:
a proper action-closed subset would split off its complement using exactness.
Proposition 2.8.7 (Etingof–Gelaki–Nikshych–Ostrik): the cardinality of the basis
of any irreducible ℤ_+-module is bounded by the maximum squared coefficient of R.