The abstract data of an AD-regular configuration space at every scale $\delta$: each $\delta$ has a type of configurations whose "ratio" measures the incidence count; configurations at scale $\delta_1 \delta_2$ can be coarsened to scale $\delta_1$ and restricted to scale $\delta_2$, and the ratio factors (up to a sub-polynomial loss) as $R(\delta_1\delta_2) \lessapprox (\delta_1\delta_2)^{-\varepsilon} R(\delta_1) R(\delta_2)$.
- ratio_factoring (δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ) (hδ₁ : 0 < δ₁) (hδ₁' : δ₁ < 1) (hδ₂ : 0 < δ₂) (hδ₂' : δ₂ < 1) (ε : ℝ) : 0 < ε → ∃ (C : ℝ), 0 < C ∧ ∀ (c : self.Config (δ₁ * δ₂)), self.ratio (δ₁ * δ₂) c ≤ C * (δ₁ * δ₂)⁻¹ ^ ε * (self.ratio δ₁ (self.coarsen δ₁ δ₂ hδ₁ hδ₁' hδ₂ hδ₂' c) * self.ratio δ₂ (self.restrict δ₁ δ₂ hδ₁ hδ₁' hδ₂ hδ₂' c))
Instances For
The raw data of an AD-regular configuration space, equipped only with the pointwise incidence decomposition $R(\delta_1\delta_2) \le R(\delta_1) R(\delta_2)$ (without the $\varepsilon$-loss factor).
Instances For
The concrete AD configuration data used in the projection theory framework.
Instances For
Derivation of the $\varepsilon$-loss factoring axiom for adConfigData from its
pointwise incidence decomposition: the ratio at scale $\delta_1\delta_2$ is bounded by
$C \cdot (\delta_1\delta_2)^{-\varepsilon}$ times the product of ratios at scales
$\delta_1$ and $\delta_2$.
The AD configuration space obtained from adConfigData by promoting its pointwise
incidence decomposition to the submultiplicative factoring axiom.
Instances For
The AD-regular incidence quantity $R_{AD}(\delta)$ at scale $\delta$, defined as the supremum of the configuration ratios over all configurations at scale $\delta$.
Instances For
$R_{AD}(\delta) \ge 0$ for every scale $\delta$.
Each individual configuration ratio is bounded by the supremum $R_{AD}(\delta)$.
Submultiplicative Lemma. If $\delta = \delta_1 \delta_2$ with $\delta_1, \delta_2 < 1$, then for every $\varepsilon > 0$ there is a constant $C > 0$ such that $R_{AD}(\delta_1\delta_2) \le C \cdot (\delta_1\delta_2)^{-\varepsilon} \cdot R_{AD}(\delta_1) \cdot R_{AD}(\delta_2)$, i.e. $R_{AD}$ is submultiplicative up to a sub-polynomial loss.