Unfolding lemma: affine space is by definition the whole σ → K.
The set of L-rational points of affine space: tuples whose every
coordinate lies in the intermediate field L. This corresponds to
𝔸^n(L) from Definition 4.41.
Instances For
A tuple is L-rational iff each of its coordinates lies in L.
Galois-fixed points in affine space: tuples fixed by every element of the
Galois group fixing L. By the Galois correspondence (cf. Definition 4.41),
these coincide with L-rational points when K/k is Galois.
Instances For
Characterization of Galois-fixed points: a tuple x is fixed iff every
L-fixing automorphism φ of K acts trivially on x.
Every L-rational point is fixed by the subgroup of automorphisms of
K/k fixing L.
Converse of affineRationalPoints_subset_galoisFixedPoints: when K/k
is Galois, a tuple fixed by all L-fixing automorphisms must be L-rational.
The zero locus Z_S of a set S of polynomials, defined as the zero locus
of the ideal generated by S. This matches Definition 4.42.
Instances For
Membership in Z_S is equivalent to all polynomials in S vanishing at
the point.
Set-builder form of zeroLocusOfSet.
The set of L-rational points on the algebraic set cut out by S:
points lying in the zero locus and having all coordinates in L. This is
Z_S(L) from Definition 4.42.
Instances For
Membership in lRationalPoints: vanishing of all polynomials in S plus
all coordinates in L.
The zero locus of any ideal is an algebraic set, by definition.
The empty set is an algebraic set, realized as the zero locus of the unit ideal.
The vanishing ideal I(V) of a set of points: all polynomials that
vanish identically on V. This is Definition 4.46.
Instances For
A polynomial lies in I(V) iff it vanishes at every point of V.
Set-builder form of vanishingIdealOfSet.
Unfolding the definition of coordinateRing in terms of vanishingIdeal.
The canonical quotient map K[x₁, …, xₙ] → K[V] from the polynomial ring
to the coordinate ring of V.
Instances For
A representation of a homogeneous rational function on the projective curve
defined by f: a numerator and denominator, both homogeneous of the same
degree, with the denominator not in the ideal (f).
- num : MvPolynomial (Fin 3) k
- den : MvPolynomial (Fin 3) k
- deg : ℕ
- num_homogeneous : self.num.IsHomogeneous self.deg
- den_homogeneous : self.den.IsHomogeneous self.deg
- den_not_in_ideal : self.den ∉ Ideal.span {f}
Instances For
The equivalence relation on HomogeneousRationalFunctions used to define
the function field of a projective curve: p₁ ∼ p₂ iff
p₁.num * p₂.den - p₂.num * p₁.den ∈ (f).
Instances For
The setoid on HomogeneousRationalFunctions built from Equiv. Reflexivity,
symmetry, and transitivity use that (f) is a prime ideal (since f is
irreducible), so denominators behave well.
Instances For
The function field of the projective curve cut out by an irreducible
f ∈ k[x, y, z]: the quotient of homogeneous rational functions by the
equivalence relation projectiveFunctionFieldSetoid f.
Instances For
The canonical map sending a homogeneous rational function to its class in the function field.
Instances For
The ideal (f) generated by an irreducible polynomial f ∈ k[x, y, z]
is prime.
An alternative model of the function field of Z(f) as the fraction
field of the quotient ring k[x, y, z] / (f).
Instances For
When I(V) is prime, the coordinate ring K[V] is an integral domain.
When I(V) is prime, the affine function field of V is genuinely a
field (it is the fraction field of an integral domain).
The canonical embedding of the coordinate ring K[V] into its fraction
field, the affine function field of V.
Instances For
The dimension of an affine variety V over k: the transcendence degree
over k of its affine function field. This realizes Definition 4.35
specialized to affine varieties.
Instances For
A ring is noetherian iff every ideal is finitely generated. Matches Definition 4.44.
Hilbert's basis theorem (Theorem 4.45): if R is noetherian, so is R[x].
The vanishing ideal I(V) of any set V ⊆ 𝔸^n is radical.
The union of two algebraic sets is algebraic, realized via the intersection of their defining ideals.
An arbitrary intersection of algebraic sets is algebraic, realized via the supremum of the corresponding ideals.
The Zariski topology on σ → K: closed sets are exactly the affine
algebraic sets, with closure under empty, arbitrary intersection, and
finite unions.
Instances For
Hilbert's Nullstellensatz (Theorem 4.49): over an algebraically closed
field K, for every ideal I ⊆ K[x₁, …, xₙ] we have
I(Z(I)) = √I.
For radical ideals I, the Nullstellensatz simplifies to
I(Z(I)) = I.
For algebraic sets V, the Nullstellensatz says Z(I(V)) = V.
Injectivity half of the algebraic-set / radical-ideal correspondence (Corollary 4.52): two algebraic sets with the same vanishing ideal are equal.
Iff-form of the weak Nullstellensatz: the zero locus of I is empty iff
I is the unit ideal.
Theorem 4.50 (weak Nullstellensatz): a proper ideal of
K[x₁, …, xₙ] over an algebraically closed K has nonempty zero locus.
The vanishing ideal of a union of two sets equals the intersection of their vanishing ideals.
The intersection of an algebraic set V with the zero locus of a single
polynomial f is again an algebraic set, realized by the ideal I + (f).
Idempotence of the Z ∘ I operation on zero loci: Z(I(Z(J))) = Z(J).
This follows from the Nullstellensatz applied to the radical of J.
One direction of Theorem 4.55: if V is an irreducible algebraic set,
then its vanishing ideal I(V) is prime.
Other direction of Theorem 4.55: an algebraic set whose vanishing ideal is prime is irreducible.
Theorem 4.55 (combined form): for an algebraic set V, irreducibility is
equivalent to primality of its vanishing ideal.
Every singleton {P} ⊆ 𝔸^n over an algebraically closed field is an
algebraic set, realized as the zero locus of its vanishing ideal (generated
by x_i - P_i).
The vanishing ideal of a single point P is maximal: it is the maximal
ideal m_P = (x_1 - P_1, …, x_n - P_n) from Corollary 4.51.
Corollary 4.51: over an algebraically closed field with finitely many
variables, every maximal ideal of K[x₁, …, xₙ] is of the form m_P for a
unique point P.
Theorem 4.34: any two transcendence bases of a field extension L/k
have the same cardinality.
For a field k of exponential characteristic p, being a perfect field
(Definition 4.38) is equivalent to being a perfect ring with respect to p.