Documentation

Atlas.ComplexVariables.code.Lecture8

Lecture 8: Integration by Substitution for Complex Line Integrals #

This file formalizes Theorem 1 from Lecture 8: the substitution rule for complex line integrals.

Main results #

noncomputable def complexLineIntegral (f : ) (γ : ) (a b : ) :

The complex line integral of f along a path γ : ℝ → ℂ over the interval [a, b], defined as ∫ t in a..b, f(γ(t)) · γ'(t) dt.

Instances For
    theorem complex_line_integral_substitution (f φ : ) (γ : ) (a b : ) (Ω : Set ) ( : IsOpen Ω) ( : DifferentiableOn φ Ω) (hγ_diff : tSet.uIcc a b, DifferentiableAt γ t) (hγ_mem : tSet.uIcc a b, γ t Ω) :
    complexLineIntegral f (φ γ) a b = complexLineIntegral (fun (z : ) => f (φ z) * deriv φ z) γ a b

    Theorem 1, Lecture 8 (Integration by Substitution for Complex Line Integrals).

    Let φ be a holomorphic function on an open set Ω ⊆ ℂ, and let γ be a differentiable path in Ω parametrized on [a, b]. Then $$\int_{\varphi(\gamma)} f(w)\,dw = \int_{\gamma} f(\varphi(z))\,\varphi'(z)\,dz,$$ i.e., the complex line integral of f along the composed path φ ∘ γ equals the complex line integral of z ↦ f(φ(z)) · φ'(z) along γ.

    The proof follows from the chain rule: (φ ∘ γ)'(t) = φ'(γ(t)) · γ'(t), which shows the two integrands are equal pointwise.

    Theorem 2: Integral of R(z²) over circles centered at the origin #

    theorem circleMap_zero_add_pi (R θ : ) :
    circleMap 0 R (θ + Real.pi) = -circleMap 0 R θ

    Shifting the angle by π on a circle centered at the origin negates the point: circleMap 0 R (θ + π) = -circleMap 0 R θ. This follows from exp(πi) = -1.

    theorem circleIntegral_comp_sq_eq_zero (f : ) (R : ) :
    (z : ) in C(0, R), f (z ^ 2) = 0

    Theorem 2, Lecture 8. Let f : ℂ → ℂ be any function. Then the circle integral of f(z²) around a circle centered at the origin is zero: ∮ z in C(0, R), f(z²) dz = 0.

    In the textbook, this is stated for a rational function R with the condition that R(z²) has no poles on the circle |z| = r. The proof uses the substitution z ↦ -z: since (-z)² = z² and the derivative d(-z) = -dz, the integrand is antiperiodic with period π in the parametrization angle, so the integral over [0, 2π] vanishes.