Lecture 8: Integration by Substitution for Complex Line Integrals #
This file formalizes Theorem 1 from Lecture 8: the substitution rule for complex line integrals.
Main results #
complexLineIntegral— the complex line integral offalong a pathγ.complex_line_integral_substitution— Ifφis holomorphic on an open setΩandγis a differentiable path inΩ, then∫_{φ(γ)} f(w) dw = ∫_γ f(φ(z)) φ'(z) dz.circleMap_zero_add_pi: The circle map centered at the origin satisfiescircleMap 0 R (θ + π) = -circleMap 0 R θ, i.e., shifting by π negates the point.circleIntegral_comp_sq_eq_zero: Theorem 2, Lecture 8. For any functionf : ℂ → ℂand any realR, the circle integral∮ z in C(0, R), f(z²) dz = 0.The proof uses the substitution
z ↦ -z. Since(-z)² = z²andd(-z) = -dz, the integral picks up a minus sign. But the circle centered at 0 is invariant underz ↦ -z(rotation by π), so the integral equals its own negative, hence it is zero.In the textbook, this is stated for rational functions
RwithR(z²) ≠ 0on the circle, but the proof works for anyf : ℂ → ℂ(when the integrand is not integrable,circleIntegralreturns 0 by convention).
Theorem 1, Lecture 8 (Integration by Substitution for Complex Line Integrals).
Let φ be a holomorphic function on an open set Ω ⊆ ℂ, and let γ be a differentiable
path in Ω parametrized on [a, b]. Then
$$\int_{\varphi(\gamma)} f(w)\,dw = \int_{\gamma} f(\varphi(z))\,\varphi'(z)\,dz,$$
i.e., the complex line integral of f along the composed path φ ∘ γ equals the
complex line integral of z ↦ f(φ(z)) · φ'(z) along γ.
The proof follows from the chain rule: (φ ∘ γ)'(t) = φ'(γ(t)) · γ'(t), which shows
the two integrands are equal pointwise.
Theorem 2: Integral of R(z²) over circles centered at the origin #
Theorem 2, Lecture 8. Let f : ℂ → ℂ be any function. Then the circle integral
of f(z²) around a circle centered at the origin is zero:
∮ z in C(0, R), f(z²) dz = 0.
In the textbook, this is stated for a rational function R with the condition that
R(z²) has no poles on the circle |z| = r. The proof uses the substitution
z ↦ -z: since (-z)² = z² and the derivative d(-z) = -dz, the integrand is
antiperiodic with period π in the parametrization angle, so the integral over
[0, 2π] vanishes.