Boundary-crossing principle: in a chain whose head satisfies $P$ but some entry does not, there exists an $R$-related adjacent pair witnessing the transition from $P$ to $\neg P$.
Every apartment is thin: each facet $F \subset C$ lies in exactly one other chamber $D$ of the apartment.
Chamber transitivity for the pre-apartment system: for any two chambers $C, D$ of an apartment, there is a bijective vertex map sending $C$ to $D$.
A bijective vertex map fixing a chamber pointwise is the identity on the apartment (pre-apartment version).
Any apartment iso fixing a chamber is bijective (pre-apartment version).
Existence of the canonical retraction $\rho_{D;C,A}$ for a pre-apartment system.
A facet $F$ contained in a maximal chamber $C$ of an apartment is a facet of $C$ in the apartment.
Pre-apartment thinness: each facet $F$ has a unique other chamber $D$ besides $C$ in the apartment.
A chamber of the apartment containing a facet $F$ is either $C$ or its unique opposite chamber across $F$.
For adjacent chambers $C, C'$, there is a vertex map fixing $C$ and sending the third chamber containing the panel to $C'$ (used to construct foldings from thickness).
Construct a folding from a simplicial map fixing a chamber and sending its panel-mate to itself — the third-chamber map of a thick complex.
Every apartment of a thick chamber complex has sufficient foldings (every adjacent pair is collapsed by some folding).
Main theorem: thickness of a chamber complex implies that every
apartment has sufficient foldings — discharging the
ThicknessImpliesAptStructureHyp.