Panel generator: in a Coxeter complex, every chamber $C$ has a chamber $D$ adjacent across the $i$-th panel with $\varphi(D) = \varphi(C) \cdot s_i$.
Backward direction: if $\varphi(C), \varphi(D)$ are chamber-adjacent in the Coxeter group and $C \neq D$, then $C, D$ are adjacent in the apartment.
Coxeter chamber-adjacency lifts to apartment adjacency (the $C \neq D$ side condition is automatic from the Coxeter adjacency).
The chamber-level retraction $\bar\rho$ is induced by a vertex map $\sigma : V \to V$ sending facets to facets.
Under the retraction $\bar\rho$, adjacent chambers either collapse to the same image or remain adjacent in the apartment.
At the level of the Coxeter labeling $\varphi$, the images of adjacent chambers under $\bar\rho$ are either equal or chamber-adjacent.
The retraction $\bar\rho$ preserves adjacency: images of adjacent chambers are either equal or adjacent in $A$.
Existence of a canonical retraction $\rho$ that lands in $A$ and preserves the $\delta$-distance from $C$.
Uniqueness of retractions: a $\delta$-preserving retraction $\rho$ must agree on $Y$ with any other $\delta$-preserving partial map $f$.
Combined statement: there exists a canonical retraction $\bar\rho$ that agrees with any $\delta$-preserving partial map $f$ on its domain $Y$.
Compatibility of a $\delta$-preserving map $f$ with the center chamber $C$: $f$ preserves $\delta(C, -)$ on $Y$, and its image is maximal in $A$.
Injectivity of $\delta$ in an apartment: assuming a Coxeter compatibility, $\delta(C, D_1) = \delta(C, D_2)$ forces $D_1 = D_2$.
Any $\delta$-preserving retraction $\bar\rho$ which fixes the apartment agrees on $Y$ with any other $\delta$-preserving partial map $f$.