Configuration of three chambers $C, D, E$ in a building, with apartments through each pair.
- C : Finset V
- D : Finset V
- E : Finset V
- apt_CD : SimplicialComplex V
- apt_CE : SimplicialComplex V
- apt_DE : SimplicialComplex V
Instances For
Triangle inequality for gallery distance: $d(C, E) \le d(C, D) + d(D, E)$.
Instances For
Three chambers $C, D, E$ are collinear if $d(C, E) = d(C, D) + d(D, E)$ (i.e. $D$ lies on a minimal gallery from $C$ to $E$).
Instances For
A strong isometry between subsets of chambers $S_1, S_2$ is a map preserving the Weyl-valued distance $\delta_W$.
Instances For
$S$ lies in an apartment if there is some apartment $A$ of the building whose face set contains $S$.
Instances For
A strong $\delta_W$-isometry whose image lies in an apartment forces its domain to lie in an apartment as well.
The identity map is a strong $\delta_W$-isometry from $S$ to itself.
Hypotheses underlying the three-chamber argument: concatenability of galleries and existence of a minimal gallery between any two maximal chambers.
- minimal_gallery_exists (C D : Finset V) : b.IsMaximal C → b.IsMaximal D → ∃ (g : Gallery b.toSimplicialComplex), g.Connects C D ∧ g.length = galleryDist b.toSimplicialComplex C D
Instances For
Every building canonically satisfies ThreeChamberHypotheses.
Three-chambers-in-a-common-apartment: if $C_1, C_2, C_3$ are collinear chambers (i.e. $d(C_1, C_3) = d(C_1, C_2) + d(C_2, C_3)$), then they all lie in some common apartment.