Two simplicial complexes on $V$ are isomorphic if there is a bijection $\varphi : V \to V$ that induces a bijection between their face sets.
Instances For
An apartment $A$ has foldings if its underlying simplicial complex extends to a chamber complex on which every pair of adjacent chambers admits a pair of foldings collapsing one chamber onto the other.
Instances For
A maximal simplex (chamber) of an apartment $A$ is also a maximal simplex of the ambient building.
If a face $C$ of an apartment $A$ is maximal in the ambient building, then it is also maximal as a face of $A$.
Every apartment of a building contains a chamber (maximal face).
Two apartments of a building that share a common chamber are isomorphic as simplicial complexes.
Simplicial complex isomorphism is transitive.
All apartments of a building are pairwise isomorphic as simplicial complexes. The proof uses that any two chambers lie in a common apartment and that apartments sharing a chamber are isomorphic.
The Coxeter type of a building: a Coxeter matrix $M$ together with the data, for each apartment $A$, of a labeling of its chambers by the Coxeter group $W(M)$ that is injective on chambers, surjective onto $W(M)$, and sends adjacent chambers to $W(M)$-adjacent group elements.
- B_idx : Type
- matrix : CoxeterMatrix self.B_idx
- apartments_iso (A : SimplicialComplex V) : A ∈ b.apartmentSystem.apartments → ∃ (cc : ChamberComplex V), cc.toSimplicialComplex = A ∧ ∃ (φ : Finset V → self.matrix.Group), (∀ (C : Finset V), A.IsMaximal C → ∀ (D : Finset V), A.IsMaximal D → φ C = φ D → C = D) ∧ (∀ (w : self.matrix.Group), ∃ (C : Finset V), A.IsMaximal C ∧ φ C = w) ∧ ∀ (C C' : Finset V), A.Adjacent C C' → CoxeterComplex.ChamberAdjacent self.matrix (φ C) (φ C')
Instances For
Every apartment of a building is (canonically isomorphic to) a Coxeter complex: there exist a Coxeter matrix $M$ and a thin chamber complex structure whose chambers are in bijection with the Coxeter group $W(M)$ in an adjacency-preserving way.
For an injective $f$, the image of a set difference equals the difference of images: $f(s \setminus t) = f(s) \setminus f(t)$.
If $\varphi \circ \mathrm{inv} = \mathrm{id}$ pointwise, then applying $\varphi$ to the $\mathrm{inv}$-image of $s$ recovers $s$.
If $\mathrm{inv} \circ \varphi = \mathrm{id}$ pointwise, then applying $\mathrm{inv}$ to the $\varphi$-image of $s$ recovers $s$.
Under a simplicial complex isomorphism $\varphi : A_0 \to A$ with inverse $\mathrm{inv}$, the pullback by $\mathrm{inv}$ of a maximal face of $A$ is a maximal face of $A_0$.
The Coxeter type of an apartment is preserved by simplicial isomorphism: if an apartment $A_0$ carries a labeling by a Coxeter group $W(M)$ realizing $A_0$ as the Coxeter complex of $M$, and $A_0 \cong A$, then $A$ also carries such a labeling for the same Coxeter matrix $M$.