Instances For
Instances For
- sigmaWord_injective (ws : List B) : Function.Injective (sigmaWord M ws)
Instances
Instances For
Translation between the two word-action conventions: $\sigma_w = \text{wordSigma}(w^R)$ where $w^R$ is the reversed word.
A positive root $\alpha \neq e_s$ stays in $\Phi^+$ after applying $\sigma_s$. The exception (the simple root $e_s$ itself) becomes $-e_s$, a negative root.
Two abstract finiteness hypotheses that supply the standard $\Phi^+$ with a
RootSystemData structure: $(1)$ finiteness of roots supported on a proper subset,
and $(2)$ finiteness of nonposRoots on the radical hyperplane.
- hyperplane_nonposRoots_finite (v₀ : B → ℝ) : (∀ (s : B), v₀ s > 0) → (∀ (t : B), ∑ u : B, v₀ u * CoxeterGroup.formVal M u t = 0) → ∀ (x : B → ℝ), ∑ s : B, v₀ s * x s = 1 → (nonposRoots (standardΦpos M) x).Finite
Instances For
Appending one letter: $\sigma_{w \cdot s}(\alpha) = \sigma_s(\sigma_w(\alpha))$.
Inductive step for the finiteness of inversion sets: if the inversion set of $w$ is finite, so is the inversion set of $w \cdot s$.
The simple root $e_s$ is positive but $\sigma_s(e_s) = -e_s$ is not in $\Phi^+$: the unique inversion of the simple reflection $s$ is $e_s$.
Construction of RootSystemData from the standard positive roots, given the two
finiteness hypotheses encapsulated in FiniteProperParabolicsHyp.
Instances For
Every point of a proper face $F_I$ (with $I \neq \emptyset$, i.e. $I \neq$ all simple roots) has nu-finiteness: only finitely many positive roots pair nonpositively.
The $W$-translate $w \cdot F_I$ of a proper Tits face is nu-finite at every point. This bounds the nonposRoots set by inversions plus translated face-finiteness.
dualSigmaWord and wordAction are definitionally equal: both fold $\sigma^\vee_s$
left-to-right along the word.
The dual simple reflection fixes the origin: $\sigma^\vee_s(0) = 0$.
Any word fixes the origin: $w \cdot 0 = 0$.
Each point of the fundamental closure is either the origin or lies in some proper face $F_I$ with $I$ the set of vanishing coordinates.
Face decomposition of the Tits cone: every $x \in U$ is either zero or lies in the $W$-translate of a proper Tits face $F_I$.
Evaluation at the standard basis vector $e_s$: $\langle e_s, x\rangle = x_s$.
Singleton word: $\sigma_{[s]} = \sigma_s$.
Sign-flip identity: $\langle e_s, \sigma^\vee_s y\rangle = -y_s$.
If $y_s < 0$ and $e_s \in \Phi^+$, then $e_s$ belongs to the set of positive roots with nonpositive pairing at $y$.
The simple root $e_s$ is not in the image of $\sigma_s$ on the nonposRoots of $\sigma^\vee_s y$, used to obtain a strict cardinality drop in the induction.
Converse direction of the Tits cone characterisation: any $x \neq 0$ satisfying nu-finiteness lies in $U$. The proof inducts on the cardinality of the nonposRoots set, using a simple reflection at a negative coordinate to strictly shrink it.
Main characterisation of the Tits cone: $U = \{0\} \cup \{x : \text{nu-finite at } x\}$. A point lies in $U$ iff it is zero or only finitely many positive roots are nonpositive on it.