Documentation

Atlas.AlgebraicTopologyI.code.Section7

A graded bilinear pairing of integer-indexed chain complexes A_* × B_* → C_*: in every bidegree (p, q) a bilinear map A_p × B_q → C_{p+q} satisfying the Leibniz rule d(a × b) = (da) × b + (-1)^p a × db together with the boundary conditions that cross-multiplying a boundary with a cycle (in either argument) lands in the boundaries. These are exactly the data needed by Lemma 7.1 to induce a bilinear pairing on homology.

Instances For
    theorem HomologyCrossProduct.GradedBilinearMap.cross_mem_cycles {A : ExactSequence.IntChainComplex} {B : ExactSequence.IntChainComplex} {C : ExactSequence.IntChainComplex} (μ : GradedBilinearMap A B C) {p q : } {a : A.X p} {b : B.X q} (ha : a A.cycles p) (hb : b B.cycles q) :
    ((μ.cross p q) a) b C.cycles (p + q)

    The cross product of two cycles is a cycle: if da = 0 and db = 0, the Leibniz rule forces d(a × b) = 0.

    Restriction of the bidegree-(p, q) cross product to cycles, packaged so that its codomain is the subgroup of cycles in C_{p+q}.

    Instances For

      Lemma 7.1. Given chain complexes A_*, B_*, C_* and a bilinear pairing A_p × B_q → C_{p+q} satisfying the Leibniz formula, the induced map on homology is a bilinear pairing H_p(A) × H_q(B) → H_{p+q}(C). This is the descent of cross_on_cycles to homology groups, using that cycles cross-multiply to cycles and that boundaries cross-multiply (against cycles) to boundaries.

      Instances For

        Theorem 7.2 (Homology cross product). Bundle packaging the existence of a natural, bilinear, and normalized homology cross product × : H_p(X) × H_q(Y) → H_{p+q}(X × Y) for singular homology. It supplies a chain-level cross product chainCross, an integer-indexed chain complex singularIntComplex X for each space, a GradedBilinearMap packaging the Leibniz formula and boundary conditions for the chain cross product, and the induced homology pairing homologyCross shown equal to the descent provided by Lemma 7.1 (homologyCross_eq_lemma71), together with the naturality and normalization properties inherited from the chain-level cross product.

        Instances For

          Technical cast lemma: rewriting an additive map SingularChains (m+1) X →+ SingularChains m X along equalities of natural-number indices behaves like casting the input and output through the corresponding equalities on the chain groups.

          Casting a chain along an equality of degrees gives zero iff the original chain was zero.

          Compatibility lemma between the boundary map and casting along an index equality m = k + 1: applying boundaryMap k after casting boundaryMap m y through h agrees with the composition boundaryMap k ∘ boundaryMap (k+1) applied to the appropriate cast of y.

          Integer-indexed boundary map on singular chains: for n ≥ 1 it is the usual boundary S_{n.toNat}(X) → S_{n.toNat - 1}(X) transported along the identifications n.toNat - 1 + 1 = n.toNat and n.toNat - 1 = (n - 1).toNat; for n < 1 it is zero. This is the data used to view singular chains as an IntChainComplex.

          Instances For

            The integer-indexed boundary squares to zero, so the singular chains assembled with singularIntBoundary form an honest chain complex over .

            Singular chains of a topological space X packaged as an IntChainComplex: in degree n the group is SingularChains n.toNat X, with differential singularIntBoundary X n, vanishing in negative degrees.

            Instances For

              Promotion of a chain-level singular cross product cp (Theorem 6.2) to a GradedBilinearMap between the integer-indexed singular chain complexes of X, Y, and X × Y: the bilinearity and Leibniz formula are inherited from cp, providing the input data for Lemma 7.1.

              Instances For

                Existence of the singular homology cross product (Theorem 7.2). A HomologyCrossProductSingular package exists: combine the chain-level cross product from Theorem 6.2 with the descent to homology supplied by Lemma 7.1 to produce a natural, bilinear, and normalized homology cross product H_p(X) × H_q(Y) → H_{p+q}(X × Y) on singular homology.