Walk Count by Type (Theorem 8.3) #
This file formalizes Theorem 8.3 from Stanley's Algebraic Combinatorics: the walk count formula α(w,λ) = f^λ · ∏_{i ∈ S_w}(b_i - a_i) for Hasse walks of a given type w in Young's lattice.
Main definitions #
WalkTypeCount.walkTypeCount— α(w,λ): number of walks of typewfrom ∅ to λWalkTypeCount.IsValidStepWord— predicate:wis a valid λ-wordWalkTypeCount.downPositions— S_w: the set of positions i where w has a down-stepWalkTypeCount.numDRight— a_i: number of D's to the right of position i in wWalkTypeCount.numURight— b_i: number of U's to the right of position i in wWalkTypeCount.downStepProduct— ∏_{i ∈ S_w}(b_i - a_i)WalkTypeCount.applyStepWord— operator application of a step word to a Finsupp elementWalkTypeCount.downFactor— recursive accumulator of D-step factors starting at level mWalkTypeCount.finalLevel— final running level after processing word w from level m
Main result #
WalkTypeCount.walkTypeCount_eq_numSYT_mul_prod— Theorem 8.3: For a valid λ-word w, α(w,λ) = f^λ · ∏_{i ∈ S_w}(b_i - a_i)
References #
- Stanley, Algebraic Combinatorics, Section 8 (Theorem 8.3)
The running level after the first k steps: number of U's minus number of D's
in positions 0, …, k-1.
Instances For
A walk type w : List HStep is a valid λ-word (Lemma 8.1) if
the net displacement equals |λ| and every prefix has non-negative running level.
Instances For
α(w,λ): The number of Hasse walks of type w starting at ∅ and ending at λ.
Instances For
S_w: the set of positions where the walk type w has a down-step.
Instances For
a_i: The number of D-steps strictly to the right of position i in w.
Instances For
b_i: The number of U-steps strictly to the right of position i in w.
Instances For
The product ∏_{i ∈ S_w}(b_i - a_i) that appears in Theorem 8.3.
Instances For
Apply a step word (list of HStep) to an element of YoungDiagram →₀ ℤ.
Each step is applied left-to-right: step 0 first.
Instances For
The net displacement of a step word: number of U's minus number of D's.
Instances For
Linearity of applyStepWord #
Auxiliary accumulator #
The product of running-level factors at D-steps when processing word w
starting at running level m. This mirrors the recursive structure of applyStepWord.
Instances For
The final running level after processing word w starting at level m.
Instances For
Running level lemmas #
finalLevel and runningLevel #
downFactor equals downStepProduct #
Bridge axioms for Theorem 8.3 #
The combinatorial bridge (linking walkTypeCount to operator coefficients)
is stated as an unproved axiom.
The book treats this as an observation (not a separate theorem).
applyStepWord w distributes over Finset.sum of basis elements.
Generalized bridge: for any start diagram, the walk count from start
to lam equals the coefficient of lam in applyStepWord w (δ_start).
Main algebraic reduction (Theorem 8.3 core) #
The operator application of a valid step word w to emptyBasis equals
downStepProduct w • iterU n emptyBasis. This is the heart of Theorem 8.3's proof.